The backtest
made a promise.
The live ledger kept it.
Zeno's live record counts 160 closed signals at 75%: public TradingView ideas, each stamped by the platform and linked, plus premium signals logged the moment they close. Wins and losses alike, reported in R multiples, the one unit leverage can't inflate.
Most backtests die on contact with the live market. This one didn't.
Curve-fitted systems look perfect in testing and collapse live. The honest test of an edge is the gap between the two numbers. Ours is zero.
Nothing was trimmed
Every regime in the sample window is in the curve — including the loss clusters you can see. A backtest that only shows its good months is an ad, not a test.
5-factor confluence only
The system skips most of the market. Entries fire only when structure break, liquidity sweep, order block, premium/discount and momentum agree. How the system works →
Fixed, mechanical exits
Stops at structural invalidation, targets at opposing liquidity. No discretionary exits, no moving the goalposts mid-trade.
160 closed signals. Open any public call on TradingView.
Every call in the record is verifiable. Public calls are published as TradingView ideas before the outcome, each with a platform timestamp that can't be edited or backdated, and each linked on the track record. Premium signals are logged with their result the moment they close, and every result counts in the same totals. The latest public calls — click any to open the chart:
Timestamps we can't fake
TradingView stamps every published idea. We couldn't backdate a single public call if we wanted to — the platform is the notary, not us.
Losses stay counted
40 losing trades are in the record right now. Deleting losers is the oldest trick in this industry; refusing to is our whole brand.
Audit it in 10 minutes
Open the track record, download the CSV of our public calls, and check each one against its TradingView chart.
A typical signal seller vs a public ledger.
| Claim | Typical signal seller | Quantum Algo |
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | "90%+", no sample size | 75% · 160 closed signals · 40 losses counted |
| Proof of timing | Screenshots after the fact | TradingView timestamp on every public idea |
| Losing trades | Deleted or never posted | Kept in the record, counted in the stats |
| Unit of results | % gains (leverage does the work) | R multiples at flat risk |
| Backtest vs live | Backtest only, or live only | Both, same number: 75% = 75% |
| What you get | A Telegram channel | The indicator on your own TradingView chart |
Every trade above came from Zeno. Four tools, one engine.
Indicators that prove themselves in public.
Percentages describe an account's leverage. R describes the strategy.
The honest unit
1R is the amount risked on one trade. Win +2R, lose −1R. Identical whether you trade $100 or $100,000 — no account-size illusions. Risk management in the Academy →
Cumulative, not compounded
We sum every trade's R with flat risk. No compounding assumptions, no leverage multipliers — the curve at the top is the raw edge.
Translate it yourself
Risk 1% per trade and +92R is roughly +92% on risk capital. Risk 0.5%, halve it. The math is yours — we just publish the R.
People who audited the ledger before they paid.
“Non-repainting signals that actually work. I verified every claim using TradingView Replay mode before buying. The backtests are legit — rare in this industry.”
Kevin P.Crypto swing trader · Zeno plan · London, UK“I tested it on demo for two weeks before going live. The signals held up exactly as shown in the backtests. That gave me the confidence to commit real capital.”
Sophia R.Swing trader · Gold & Indices · Zeno plan“Best SMC indicator I've used. The order block grading system filters out the low-quality zones that other indicators show. Less noise, more profit.”
James O.Day trader · BTC & XAUUSD · London, UK★★★★★ 4.9 / 5 across 18 published reviews · read them all →
Questions people ask before they trust a number.
What does cumulative R mean?
What is Quantum Algo's win rate?
How can I verify the live results?
Is a 75% win rate realistic?
Is the equity chart a real account?
Does the backtest match live performance?
Don't trust us. Verify us.
The public calls are on TradingView, the timestamps aren't ours to fake, and every loss is counted. Trade the same system.
Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Results shown in R multiples at flat risk; no compounding.